What Did You Do
During The Illegal War
Daddy/Mommy?
[BREAK]
We finally know where River has been. Now, the more important questions are "Where are you? What are you doing?"
I run a dinky little mailing list/service that pushes out news stories, articles and links to blog posts daily, for a bunch of activists, reporters, friends and relatives. (Okay, my wife gets hit with the full 50 to 75+ news articles I forward a day, while my daughter, whose boss believes she should read at home, can only suffer through a minimal list of about a dozen or so of the most important pieces.)
I'd venture that everyone on the list is a Liberal, although some might seek the camouflage of the "Progressive" labeling.
They all view the Bush admin as an enemy of all that was once good about America, and see through the Bushie use of fear as a political power enhancer.

They were well read, including reports in the international media.
Therefore, they were all against our attacking, invading and occupying Iraq.
They are all good people, who work hard to leave the planet/country in as good a shape, if not better, than when they began helping to steer the ship of state.
So, being that they are good people, I will unfairly use them as a sample for all the good people who complain about Bush, who think the Iraq war is farce - bloody, death dealing farce, but farce all the same - and who worry that future generations - including their own kids - will be deprived of the experience of knowing one lives in one of the most wonderful countries on the planet.
While I fear this may look as a way of saying "I'm better than you", I mean nothing of the sort. For I believe that until I find a way to be part of something that stops our collective fall into a well of self-defeating insanity, I'm as much, if not more, guilty as anyone.
If you've fought in an illegal war, as I have, you have a greater duty to prevent future illegal wars by your country.
If you have children, your duty geometrically increases.
If you possess any informational tools, such as my single typing finger or you have access to the much more powerful bullhorn of the Town Crier, mainstream media, and you waste such power in other, less worthy pursuits, guilt has to be your burden.
(Not meaning to single out NOW, but this arrived in my mailbox, just as I finished reading the new Baghdad Burning entry. If, when studying the rise of . . . here it comes! . . . Hitler, we discovered that a major organization of opposition to Hitler's policies was sending out drivel like this instead of spending EVERY moment battling for the rights it stands for, we would be shaking our heads and wondering where the sanity of that group had gone. Come on, admit it! "LOVE YOUR BODY DAY!" It sounds like something from a Foley email that Hastert thought was just cute and friendly.)
Here are some conclusions, based on my small sampling of good, compassionate people:
Many "good people" avoid demonstrations/protests. for what I'm sure they view as legitimate reasons.
Some have shared their reasons with me. Kids; fear of being seen by someone from work and, the number 1 reason, the organizers support other causes with which I disagree.
The most recent protest I attended, a couple of weeks ago, was called for by The World Can't Wait. I was the ONLY member from my mailing list to attend.

Seems that:

By August 16, 2005, attendance at protests were at a low. But a few of my list members did attend the candlelight marches in their neighborhoods.
Earlier on, there was more of a showing at marches. At the Republican Convention in NYC, the crowd was huge. And more than few of my mailing list members were there on August 29, 2001.


Barb and I at the Repugnant National Convention demonstration.
Of course, what should have been the most important demonstration of American sentiment of all, the February 15, 2003 (photo below) pre-attack march, was attended by the largest number of my sample. And, of course, it was when many of us discovered that the media had gone from biased propagandists to full out sycophantic whores for the Bush administration. Suddenly, a demonstration that could paralyze NYC on a weekend day was only attended by "thousands" of protesters, according to the NY Times. We, who were there, knew that the Times must have only counted people on one of the alternate/overflow avenues . . . and they must have only counted the "thousands" of crowd control cops there. But, the Times either wouldn't report, or couldn't conceive, that even after all of its front page lies about Iraq, and the barge loads of BS Judy Miller was transcribing Karl Rove's take on Ahmad Chalabi's fantasies, people, MILES AND MILES OF INTELLIGENT PEOPLE, still believed we had no business attacking Iraq.
February 15, 2003. A month prior to our illegal attack on Iraq.
Why do I bore/chastise you with all of this?
Quite simply, I'm looking for a way to do more to stop our country's decline into history's Hell.
More Here
[/BREAK]
We finally know where River has been. Now, the more important questions are "Where are you? What are you doing?"
I run a dinky little mailing list/service that pushes out news stories, articles and links to blog posts daily, for a bunch of activists, reporters, friends and relatives. (Okay, my wife gets hit with the full 50 to 75+ news articles I forward a day, while my daughter, whose boss believes she should read at home, can only suffer through a minimal list of about a dozen or so of the most important pieces.)
I'd venture that everyone on the list is a Liberal, although some might seek the camouflage of the "Progressive" labeling.
They all view the Bush admin as an enemy of all that was once good about America, and see through the Bushie use of fear as a political power enhancer.
Therefore, they were all against our attacking, invading and occupying Iraq.

Seems that:
- 1) it was held during working hours (though it continued until well after business hours.)
- 2) The organizers had some connection to either socialist or communist organizations.

By August 16, 2005, attendance at protests were at a low. But a few of my list members did attend the candlelight marches in their neighborhoods.
Earlier on, there was more of a showing at marches. At the Republican Convention in NYC, the crowd was huge. And more than few of my mailing list members were there on August 29, 2001.


Barb and I at the Repugnant National Convention demonstration.
Of course, what should have been the most important demonstration of American sentiment of all, the February 15, 2003 (photo below) pre-attack march, was attended by the largest number of my sample. And, of course, it was when many of us discovered that the media had gone from biased propagandists to full out sycophantic whores for the Bush administration. Suddenly, a demonstration that could paralyze NYC on a weekend day was only attended by "thousands" of protesters, according to the NY Times. We, who were there, knew that the Times must have only counted people on one of the alternate/overflow avenues . . . and they must have only counted the "thousands" of crowd control cops there. But, the Times either wouldn't report, or couldn't conceive, that even after all of its front page lies about Iraq, and the barge loads of BS Judy Miller was transcribing Karl Rove's take on Ahmad Chalabi's fantasies, people, MILES AND MILES OF INTELLIGENT PEOPLE, still believed we had no business attacking Iraq.
February 15, 2003. A month prior to our illegal attack on Iraq.
[BREAK]
And, more importantly, I do so out of a painful guilt.
Guilt for having participated in a war for America built on lies. Lies told in the 1960's, but ones just as deadly for a people we claimed we wanted to "save", "help", "aid."
Guilt for thinking that by blogging with criticism of the bastardly Bush regime I was "doing my part."
Guilt that by reading the Baghdad Burning blog I was just trying to grant myself some easy absolution for what is being done in my name.
In another heaping from Amerika's extended table filled with platters of irony, it was the long recent absence of River from her blog that gnawed at my conscience much more than her poetic manner of bringing the suffering of her loved ones, many of whom she has never met, to our screens.
Well, River is alive/back.
I implore any of you who have not visited Baghdad Burning to go there now. And, if you can stomach it after reading today's entry, delve into her archives. Pick dates/entries at random. They are all worthy of your time. (Billmon at Whiskey Bar has more on this!)
Then think how cruel/silly we must seem to her, or anyone with an IQ above . . . say GW, when instead of concentrating on the two things that history will soon condemn all of us for, fighting with mythical enemies while a domestic coup has ripped our country away from us and returned her as a soiled, wretched and horrifying monster unworthy of her old name - America. And the Congress has acted as Bush Crime Family's getaway driver, if not an even more culpable associate.
Over a half-million Iraqis are dead, with sides drawn in a civil war that has militia vs militia and our own dead troop count steadily rises, all due to the majority of Americans believing a deceptive, blood-lusting, power-hungry bunch of demons.
Yet life goes on as if Iraq were a place that Martians are fighting until it is extinct of life.
Our village idiot has finally seen some comparison between Vietnam and Iraq, though he pleads for more time to let a bit more blood enrich the soil while pushing his dumbing of America (No Children Allowed To Advance . . . er, I mean, No Child Left Behind plan/plot to help military recruitment, turn school leaders into cheats and curb critical thought in public school while making million$ for his slightly crooked brother. And, as reported by David Sirota, on 9/1/04, the Wall Street Journal reported "polls show few voters are impressed with President Bush's 'No Child Left Behind' education effort." An August 2004 Gallup poll found that a majority of Americans had serious problems with NCLB testing requirements.
A 2006 poll gives similar result.
The Bushie misuse of faith has finally been documented, as had their incompetence in so many areas of government, from war to the economy.
America?
What had once been a proud country, with her probably earning a 90-95% from my own yearly report card of a simplistic overall good-done-by vs bad-caused-by.
She was never perfect, and occasionally horrid. (Slavery, Indian Affairs/genocide, poverty in the world's richest country etc.)
But my God, the good she did was so spectacular it shamed most of the international community.
From her cradling of the baby known as democracy, through to a Marshal Plan that aided enemies in ways unheard of; from her internal, and sorrowfully not yet over, battle to rid itself of the stain of slavery and discrimination based on labels, not character, through America's sheltering of oppressed and frightened refugees, she has stood tall.
Now, when she needs the help of those who have profited in so many ways, financially being the least of those gains, I'm praying (as an agnostic, that alone should shine some light on the depths I feel we've reached) that this election becomes the miracle drug that begins a spectacular cure for the old lady. That the antibodies (Democrats, Republicans, and Independents) will quickly assess (via Congressional investigations) the enemy (those who lied us into war, who plotted to allow torture, illegal detention and the shredding of our Constitution etc.), swiftly wipe it out (jail terms for the very guilty, public humiliation for the sycophants who became enablers) and destroy present day Amerika once and for all.
And that the Bush Crime Family, and the Repugnants who aided them, suffers the gravest torture they could ever fathom in their vile black hearts: a healthy, respected America, once again shielded from harm, both external and internal, by a strong Constitution and a people willing to risk ALL (or at least a walk around their city with other protesters) to leave a country to future generations that will make them as proud of us as we are of the heroes of the past few who granted us the privilege of being born/naturalized into the greatest country on this suffering globe!
PS: Move On has a suggestion that might help America, AND help in regaining our self-esteem as the caretakers of our democracy. Voting will be problematic in some cases this year, so do what you can to help insure that if we are to become a Christo-Corporate-Fascist state, we do so through the ballot box!
* Repugnant: A former Republican who allowed a lust for power and/or blood override the principles the Republican Party espouses.
While Repugnants now rule our country, they are still (the agnostic prays, again) a minority of their party. And, come election day, they will be suffering panic attacks as they wait for the majority of Republicans to find out just how much damage they've done to their party, their country and their citizens.
=====
[/BREAK]
Baghdad Burning The Lancet Study... This has been the longest time I have been away from blogging. There were several reasons for my disappearance the major one being the fact that every time I felt the urge to write about Iraq, about the situation, I'd be filled with a certain hopelessness that can't be put into words and that I suspect other Iraqis feel also. It's very difficult at this point to connect to the internet and try to read the articles written by so-called specialists and analysts and politicians. They write about and discuss Iraq as I might write about the Ivory Coast or Cambodia- with a detachment and lack of sentiment that- I suppose- is meant to be impartial. Hearing American politicians is even worse. They fall between idiots like Bush- constantly and totally in denial, and opportunists who want to use the war and ensuing chaos to promote themselves. The latest horror is the study published in the Lancet Journal concluding that over 600,000 Iraqis have been killed since the war. Reading about it left me with mixed feelings. On the one hand, it sounded like a reasonable figure. It wasn't at all surprising. On the other hand, I so wanted it to be wrong. But... who to believe? Who to believe....? American politicians... or highly reputable scientists using a reliable scientific survey technique? The responses were typical- war supporters said the number was nonsense because, of course, who would want to admit that an action they so heartily supported led to the deaths of 600,000 people (even if they were just crazy Iraqis…)? Admitting a number like that would be the equivalent of admitting they had endorsed, say, a tsunami, or an earthquake with a magnitude of 9 on the Richter scale, or the occupation of a developing country by a ruthless superpower… oh wait- that one actually happened. Is the number really that preposterous? Thousands of Iraqis are dying every month- that is undeniable. And yes, they are dying as a direct result of the war and occupation (very few of them are actually dying of bliss, as war-supporters and Puppets would have you believe).More From Riverbend Here- - - SNIP Let's pretend the 600,000+ number is all wrong and that the minimum is the correct number: nearly 400,000. Is that better? Prior to the war, the Bush administration kept claiming that Saddam killed 300,000 Iraqis over 24 years. After this latest report published in The Lancet, 300,000 is looking quite modest and tame. Congratulations Bush et al. Everyone knows the 'official numbers' about Iraqi deaths as a direct result of the war and occupation are far less than reality (yes- even you war hawks know this, in your minuscule heart of hearts). This latest report is probably closer to the truth than anything that's been published yet. And what about American military deaths? When will someone do a study on the actual number of those? If the Bush administration is lying so vehemently about the number of dead Iraqis, one can only imagine the extent of lying about dead Americans…

- - - SNIP
Let's pretend the 600,000+ number is all wrong and that the minimum is the correct number: nearly 400,000. Is that better? Prior to the war, the Bush administration kept claiming that Saddam killed 300,000 Iraqis over 24 years. After this latest report published in The Lancet, 300,000 is looking quite modest and tame. Congratulations Bush et al.
Everyone knows the 'official numbers' about Iraqi deaths as a direct result of the war and occupation are far less than reality (yes- even you war hawks know this, in your minuscule heart of hearts). This latest report is probably closer to the truth than anything that's been published yet. And what about American military deaths? When will someone do a study on the actual number of those? If the Bush administration is lying so vehemently about the number of dead Iraqis, one can only imagine the extent of lying about dead Americans…

Comments
Posted by: Mixter | October 20, 2006 2:27 PM
Posted by: Jack Ballinger | October 20, 2006 3:02 PM